ANGLE COCK APR-101053 (YE3101)
ANGLE COCK COS-103053 (YE3108)
BIB COCK 2 WAY APR-101041 (YE3104)
BIB COCK 2 WAY COS-103041 (YE3110)
BIB COCK APR-101037 (YE3102)
BIB COCK WITH FLANGE COS-103037 (YE3111)
LONG BODY APR-101107 (YE3103)
LONG BODY BIB COCK COS-103107 (YE3115)
PILLAR COCK APR-101001M (YE3100)
PILLAR COCK COS-103001M (YE3107)
SINK COCK APR-101347N (YE3105)
SINK COCK COS-103347N (YE3109)
WALL HUNG WASH BASIN ECS-811 (YE4000)
WALL MIXER 3 IN 1 APR-101281 (YE3113)
WALL MIXER 3 IN 1 COS-103281 (W) PROV (YE3114)
WALL MIXER APR-101273 (YE3000)
WALL MIXER(W) PROVISION COS-103273 (YE3106)
WESTERN CLOSET 851S220SPPSM ECS (YB7500)
WESTERN CLOSET AIS-101853S220SPPSM (YB7501)
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.