SOHO TOILET BRUSH (YF3080)
SONATA CABINET BIG (YG9601)
SPLASH FAUCET HEAD (YW3027)
SPRING TYPE SINK COCK CP (YW2029)
SQUARE BASKET DOUBLE (YP6007)
SQUARE HOOK TOWEL ROD 24 INCH (YH1210)
SS CLAMP 304 GRAD (YG3021)
SS MIRROR BOX 14X20 OPEN TYPE (YM5003)
SS MIRROR BOX 16X24 OPEN TYPE (YM5004)
TACORI TOWEL BAR 20 INCH CP/AB (YD4105)
TAHOE SOAP DISPENCER (YF3159)
TANDY BRUSH HOLDER (YG3111)
TANGENT BRASS SOAP DISH (CP) (YD2539)
TANGENT GLASS SOAP DISH (CP) (YD2532)
TANGENT LIQUID SOAP DISPENCER (CP) (YD2538)
TANGENT NAPKIN RING (CP) (YD2534)
TANGENT PAPER HOLDER WITH LID (CP) (YD2537)
TANGENT ROBE HOOK DOUBLE (CP) (YD2535)
TANGENT TOWEL BAR 24 INCH (CP) (YD2531)
TANGENT TOWEL RACK 24 INCH (CP) (YD2540)
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.