PUSH COCK (TMP12606)
QUEENS 2 WAY BIB COCK QQT-7041 (YJ2025)
QUEENS 2IN1 WALL MIXER QQT-7273UPR (YJ2026)
QUEENS 3IN1 WALL MIXER QQT-7281 (YJ2027)
QUEENS ANGLE COCK QQT-7053 (YJ2024)
QUEENS BIB COCK QQT-7037 (YJ2021)
QUEENS CONCEALED STOP COCK QQT-7083K (TMP11837)
QUEENS PILLAR COCK QQT-7011 (YJ2023)
QUEENS SINK COCK QQT-7347 (YJ2028)
QUEENS SINK MIXER QQT-7309 (YJ2030)
RAZO 2IN1 WALL MIXER (YW2332)
RAZO ANGLE COCK (YW2333)
RAZO BIB COCK (YW2335)
SINGLE CON STOP COCK ALD-441 (YJ2091)
SINGLE LEVER BASIN MIX W/O POP UP OPP-15011BPM (YJ2118)
SINGLE LEVER BASIN MIXER ALD-233N (YJ3130)
SINGLE LEVER EXPOSED PART KIT FLR-5065K (YJ3124)
SINGLE LEVER EXPOSED PART KIT FLR-5065NK (YJ3140)
SINGLE LEVER EXPOSED PART KIT VGP-81065NK (YJ3208)
SINGLE LEVER EXPOSED PART OF DIVERTOR VGP-81079NK (YJ3073)
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.