SOLAR STREET LIGHT 90W (YPD1359)
SPARKLE ELE DUO-TUNE BELL 4031 (YG8393)
SPECTRA 4002 DIGN DONG BELL (YG10324)
SPHERICAL BULB PBUM01157 15W-6500K (YPD1260)
STRATO 12W LED BATTERN 6K (YG8845)
STRATO 12W LED TUBE LIGHT (YG10378)
STRATO 20WATT EMERGENGY BATTEN (YG9946)
STRATO GOLD BATTEN 20W (YG10387)
STREET CLAMP 1 INCH (YPD1317)
STREET LIGHT 100W (YPD1234)
STREET LIGHT 200W (YPS1343)
STREET LIGHT LED 100W (YPD1168)
STREET LIGHT LED 24W (YPD1183)
STRIO DING DONG BELL 4008 (YG10326)
STRIP LIGHT 240 LED W/WHITE (YPD1306)
STRIP LIGHT FSP-055 15W COB 24V(MTR) (YH1069)
STYLO SWITCH AC1361 10A 1WAY -1M GL (YG8374)
STYLO SWITCH AC1363 10AX 2WAY -1M GL (YG8375)
SURFACE HSC-010A 3W (YH1036)
SURFACE LIGHT ZENO 15WATT SQ 6K (YG8840)
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.