ALESSI BRASS SOAP DISH (CP) (YD2467)
ALESSI GLASS SOAP DISH (YD2463)
ALESSI LIQUID SOAP DISPENCER (CP) (YD2464)
ALESSI NAPKIN RING (CP) (YD2462)
ALESSI PAPER HOLDER WITH LID (CP) (YD2468)
ALESSI TOWEL RACK 24 INCH (YD2470)
ALESSI TOWEL ROD 24 INCH (CP) (YD2466)
ALESSI TUMBLER HOLDER (CP) (YD2660)
ANGILA BRASS SOAP DISH (YD4167)
ANGILA GTOWEL ROD 18 INCH (YD4168)
ANGILA LIQUID SOAP DISPENSER (YD4166)
ANGILA NAPKIN RING (YD4164)
ANGILA PAPER HOLDER WITH LID (YD4165)
ANGILA ROBE HOOK CP (YD4170)
ANGILA TOWEL RACK 24 INCH CP (YD4040)
ANGILA TOWEL ROD 18 INCH (YD4180)
ANGILA TOWEL ROD 24 INCH (YD4162)
ANGILA TUMBLER HOLDER (YD4163)
BRASS CLASSIC LIQUID DISPENCER SQ001 CP (YD2484)
BRASS SHELF BS001 300MM (CP) (YD4037)
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.