OVER HEAD SHOWER ALD-024 WITH ARM SET 4X4 (TMP11472)
OVER HEAD SHOWER ALD-540 12X12 SS (YE5119)
OVER HEAD SHOWER BAUFLOW 23198000 W/M (YG6263)
OVER HEAD SHOWER E8380A1 PLUTO WITH ARM (YP4218)
OVER HEAD SHOWER METOR 4X4 CP SQUARE (YR1023)
OVER HEAD SHOWER METOR 6X6 CP SQUARE (YR1033)
OVER HEAD SHOWER METOR 8X8 CP SQUARE (YR2326)
OVER HEAD SHOWER MULTIFLOW T9986A1 (YP3038)
OVER HEAD SHOWER OHS-1605 (150MM) SQUARE (YJ1627)
OVER HEAD SHOWER OHS-1619 MAZE (YJ3064)
OVER HEAD SHOWER OHS-1623 MAZE (YJ3134)
OVER HEAD SHOWER OHS-1629 MAZE (YJ3204)
OVER HEAD SHOWER OHS-1635 MAZE OVAL (YJ3234)
OVER HEAD SHOWER OHS-1665 (YJ3225)
OVER HEAD SHOWER OHS-1789 (YJ2114)
OVER HEAD SHOWER OHS-1989 SINGLE FLOW (YJ2321)
OVER HEAD SHOWER OHS-35497 (TMP12832)
OVER HEAD SHOWER OHS-85859M ALIVE MAZE 200X300MM (YJ3057)
OVER HEAD SHOWER OHS-CHR-1989 (YJ2011)
OVER HEAD SHOWER RS-3201 ROUND 6X6 CP (YY1185)
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.