SURFACE LIGHT 22W 3IN1 SQ/RO (YPD12003)
SURFACE LIGHT 8W ROUND (YPD1298)
SURFACE LIGHT HS 004B 5W (YH1035)
SURFACE LIGHT HS 006 10W (YH1064)
SWITCH BELL PUSH AA1013 1M GL (YG7906)
SWITCH 10A 1WAY AA1001 GR (YG7953)
SWITCH 1371 ZICONO 20A 1WAY GR (YG7683 )
SWITCH 1372 ZICONO 20A 1 WAY(IND) GL (YG7678)
SWITCH 2074 W/KEY FOB 32A DP GL-2M (YG7921)
SWITCH 2074 W/KEY FOB 32A DP GM 2M (YG7945)
SWITCH AA 2399 SLIMO 32A DP (W) IND E/G-2M (YG8789)
SWITCH AA1001 10A 1 WAY GL (YG7904)
SWITCH AA1001 10A 1 WAY GM (YG7929)
SWITCH AA1005 20A 1WAY GL (YG7907)
SWITCH AA1005 20A 1WAY GM (YG7932)
SWITCH AA1005 20A 1WAY GR (YG7955)
SWITCH AA1009 10A 2 WAY GR (YG8189)
SWITCH AA1009 10A 2 WAY GL (YG7905)
SWITCH AA1009 10A 2 WAY GM (YG7930)
SWITCH AA1011 20A 2WAY 1M-GL (YG8786)
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.