BFMC033 CHANDLIER (YB5114)
BFNI204 CHANDLIER (YB5108)
BFNI302 CHANDELIER (YB5130)
BLANK PLATE 1M AA1052 GR (YG8191)
BLANK PLATE AA1052 1M GL (YG7970)
BLANK PLATE AA1052 1M GM (YG8138)
BLANK PLATE AC1052 G10 -1M GM (YG8359)
BLANK PLATE GL AC1052 G10 (YG8381)
BULB G-9 LED(YPD1293)
BULB PBUM36127 B22 12W 240D 6500K (YPD1409)
BULK HEAD FB-002 15W(4090) (YH1024)
BULK HEAD HB-001 8W (4090) 6K (YH1000)
CABILE 1100V 1.5SQMM (90MTR) FR (YR1000)
CABILE 1100V 2.5SQMM (90MTR) FR (YR1100)
CABILE 1100V 6.0SQMM (90MTR) FR (YR1101)
CABILE 90MTR 1.5SQMM R2
CABILE 90MTR 1SQMM R1
CABILE 90MTR 2.5SQMM R3
CABILE 90MTR 4.0SQMM R4
CABILE 90MTR 6.0SQMM R5
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.